We are back in our Data Engineering Weekly Radio for edition #120. We will take 2 or 3 articles from each week's Data Engineering Weekly edition and go through an in-depth analysis.
From editor #120, we took the following articles
Topic 1: Colin Campbell: The Case for Data Contracts - Preventative data quality rather than reactive data quality
In this episode, we focus on the importance of data contracts in preventing data quality issues. We discuss an article by Colin Campbell highlighting the need for a data catalog and the market scope for data contract solutions. We also touch on the idea that data creation will be a decentralized process and the role of tools like data contracts in enabling successful decentralized data modeling. We emphasize the importance of creating high-quality data and the need for technological and organizational solutions to achieve this goal.
Key highlights of the conversation
"Preventative data quality rather than reactive data quality. It should start with contracts." - Colin Campbell. - Author of the article
"Contracts put a preventive structure in place" - Ashwin.
"The successful data-driven companies all do one thing very well. They create high-quality data." - Ananth.
Ananth’s post on Schemata
Topic 2: Yerachmiel Feltzman: Action-Position data quality assessment framework
In this conversation, we discuss a framework for data quality assessment called the Action Position framework. The framework helps define what actions should be taken based on the severity of the data quality problem. We also discuss two patterns for data quality: Write-Audit-Publish (WAP) and Audit-Write-Publish (AWP). The WAP pattern involves writing data, auditing it, and publishing it, while the AWP pattern involves auditing data, writing it, and publishing it. We encourage readers to share their best practices for addressing data quality issues.
Are you using any Data Quality framework in your organization? Do you have any best practices on how you address data quality issues? What do you think of the action-position data quality framework? Please add your comments in the SubStack chat.
Topic 3: Guy Fighel - Stop emphasizing the Data Catalog
We discuss the limitations of data catalogs and the author’s view on the semantic layer as an alternative. The author argues that data catalogs are passive and quickly become outdated and that a stronger contract with enforced data quality could be a better solution. We also highlight the cost factors of implementing a data catalog and suggest that a more decentralized approach may be necessary to keep up with the increasing number of data sources. Innovation in this space is needed to improve organizations' discoverability and consumption of data assets.
Something to think about in this conversation
"If you don't catalog everything and we only catalog what is required for the purpose of business decision-making, does that solve the data catalog problem in an organization?"